Carnegie Mellon University

State Affect (BCS, PCS1, PMBC)

Title

Mood States Scale

Study

BCS

Copyright Information

Not a copyrighted scale

Primary References

Zevon, M. A., & Tellegen, A. (1982). The structure of mood change: An idiographic/nomothetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 111-22.

Cohen, S., Tyrrell, D. A. J., & Smith, A. P. (1991). Psychological stress and susceptibility to the common cold. New England Journal of Medicine, 325, 606-612.

Purpose

To assess current (state) levels of positive and negative affect.

Type of Measure

Modified.  The scale used in BCS included 30 items derived from the 60 mood adjectives identified by Zevon and Tellegen (1982) from their factor analyses of an initial pool of 117 affect-related words and phrases.

Description

Using a 5-point scale, respondents rated the extent to which each of 30 mood-related adjectives described how they had been feeling during the past week.  The Mood States Scale was administered once during either of the 2 pre-challenge quarantine days, with 15 items each being included as a part of questionnaire sets 1 and 2, respectively (see Table 1).

Scaling

0 = Not at all, 1 = A little, 2 = Moderately, 3 = Quite a bit, 4 = Extremely

Number of Items

30

Scoring/Variables

State positive and negative mood subscales derived from the Zevon & Tellegen (1982) factor analysis are displayed in Table 1.  The table also contains data on scale internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) as computed in the BCS sample of 399.

State Mood Scales Derived from Zevon & Tellegen (1982) Factor Analysis

Title

State Adjective Questionnaire – State Affect Scale (22-item [PCS1]; 18-item [PMBC])

Studies

PCS1, PMBC

Copyright Information

Not a copyrighted scale

Primary References

Usala, P. D., & Hertzog, C. (1989). Measurement of affective states in adults. Evaluation of an adjective rating scale instrument. Research on Aging, 11, 403-426.

Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Turner, R. B., Alper, C. M., & Skoner, D. P. (2003).  Emotional style and susceptibility to the common cold. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 652–657.

Purpose

To assess state levels of positive and negative affect.

Type of Measure

Created. The 22 items used to measure state affect (mood) in PCS1 were included as part of the larger State Adjective Questionnaire (StAQ), which is comprised of 88 items assessing state positive and negative mood, arousal, and personal attributes.  Creation of the State Affect Scale component of the StAQ was based on Usala & Hertzog’s (1989) factor analysis of 65 mood adjectives.  The scale can be broken down into three 3-item positive affect subscales; three 3-item negative affect scales; and one 4-item fatigue subscale (see Trait Adjective Questionnaire – Trait Affect Scale and Table 2, below).  The State Affect Scale was administered in PMBC as an 18-item questionnaire that did not include the 4 items pertaining to fatigue.

Description

PCS1: Using a 5-point scale, participants rated the accuracy with which each of several mood-related adjectives described how they had been feeling during the past 24 hours.

PMBC: Using a 5-point scale, participants rated the frequency with which each of several mood-related adjectives applied to how they had been feeling during the past week.

In both studies, the State Affect Scale was administered once (PCS1, Quarantine Day 1; PMBC, Quarantine Day 0).

Scaling

PCS1:  0 = Not at all accurate, 1 = A little accurate, 2 = Moderately accurate, 3 = Quite a bit accurate, 4 = Extremely accurate

PMBC:  0 = Never, 1 = Rarely, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Frequently, 4 = Always

Number of Items

PCS1:  22
PMBC:  18

Scoring/Variables

Subscale scores were computed by summing the response values of the component items (see Trait Adjective Questionnaire - Trait Affect Scale for details).  Total Positive and Negative Affect scale scores were computed by summing their component subscales. Table 2 contains indicators of internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) computed for the PCS1 (n=276) and PMBC (n=193) sample, respectively.

State Affect Table 2

Title

State Adjective Questionnaire - Affect Circumplex Scale

Study

PCS1

Copyright Information

Not a copyrighted scale

Primary Reference

Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E., 1992. Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotions. In: Clark, M. S. (Ed.), Emotion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Purpose

To evaluate two orthogonal dimensions of state affect: valence and activation.

Type of Measure

Created.  The theoretical basis of the measure was derived from Larsen & Diener’s (1992) Circumplex Model of emotion. The 25 items that comprise the Affect Circumplex Scale were included as part of the larger State Adjective Questionnaire (StAQ) that was administered in PCS1, and several overlap with those comprising the 22-item State Affect Scale described above.  The primary difference between the two scales is that the Affect Circumplex Scale is designed in such a way that the valence (positive vs. negative) and activation (active vs. passive) components of state mood can be examined independently.

Description

Using a 5-point response scale, respondents indicate how accurately each of several adjectives describes how they had been feeling during the past 24 hours.  The StAQ Affect Circumplex Scale was administered once, on Quarantine Day 1.

Scaling

0 = Not at all accurate, 1 = A little accurate, 2 = Moderately accurate, 3 = Quite a bit accurate, 4 = Extremely accurate

Number of Items

25

Scoring/Variables

Subscale scores were computed by summing the response values of the component items (see Trait Adjective Questionnaire - Affect Circumplex Scale for details).  Table 3 displays indicators of internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) for each of the subscales comprising the State Affect Circumplex Scale computed for the PCS1 sample (n=276).

State Affect Table 3

Title

State Adjective Questionnaire – Stress-Arousal Circumplex Scale (Based on the Mackay Circumplex Model)

Study

PCS1

Copyright Information

Not a copyrighted scale

Primary Reference

Mackay, C., Cox, T., Burrows, G., & Lazzerini, T. (1978). An inventory for the measurement of self-reported stress and arousal. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 283-284.

Purpose

To evaluate two orthogonal dimensions of state affect:  stress and arousal.

Type of Measure

Created.  The theoretical basis of the measure was derived from Mackay et al.’s (1978) Stress Arousal Checklist (SACL; Mackay et al., 1978).

Description

Using a 5-point response scale, respondents indicate how accurately each of several adjectives describes how they had been feeling during the past 24 hours.

Administration

The 20 items comprising the Stress-Arousal Circumplex Scale were included as a part of the larger State Adjective Questionnaire (StAQ), which was administered on Quarantine Day 1 (see PCS1 Trial Outline).

Scaling

0 = Not at all accurate, 1 = A little accurate, 2 = Moderately accurate, 3 = Quite a bit accurate, 4 = Extremely accurate

Number of Items

20

Scoring/Variables

Four subscales can be derived from the StAQ Stress-Arousal Circumplex Scale which each represent either the positive or negative pole of stress or arousal, respectively.  Subscale scores are computed by summing the response values of the component items (see Trait Adjective Questionnaire – Stress-Arousal Circumplex Scale for additional details about scoring).