Direct polymerization of functional monomers - Matyjaszewski Polymer Group - Carnegie Mellon University

Direct polymerization of functional monomers 

route 1

Advantages:

  • Direct incorporation of functional groups into the polymer backbone

  • No post-polymerization modification required

  • High degree of functionality (DPfunctional monomer)

  • Arrangement dependent on (co)polymer architecture

  • Plethora of monomers with different functionality available 

A number of monomers containing polar functional groups have been successfully polymerized by ATRP. They include acrylonitrile (AN),(1-5) (meth)acrylamides,(6,7) 4-vinyl pyridine (4VP),(8,9) dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA),(10) and monomers containing  an -OH group such as 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate (HEA)(11) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA).(12) Glycidyl acrylate(13) has also been polymerized by ATRP yielding well-defined polymers containing the reactive glycidyl group, which can be used as a precursor for other functional groups.(14)  Water-soluble monomers (both neutral and ionic) can be polymerized in controlled fashion by ATRP directly in protic (aqueous) media.(15,16) Some examples of monomers, including some with polar groups that have been polymerized by ATRP, are shown below.

monomers 1

ATRP catalysts with strongly binding ligands should be used for copolymerization of monomers containing functional groups (mostly substituted amides, amines, or pyridines) to avoid, or reduce, competitive complex formation between the monomer or polymer and the copper center.(17) In many cases, catalyst destabilization can be suppressed by selection of the proper ligand or addition of excess ligand or excess "pseudo" ligand.  For example, in the ATRP of sodium 4-styrenesulfonate in aqueous solution, there is a rapid disproportionation of the ATRP catalyst, resulting in loss of control. However, this disproportionation reaction is prevented in the presence of excess pyridine (a "pseudo" bpy ligand) or added bromide ions.(18) This is shown in the following table where water and a 1:1 water/pyridine mixture was used as the solvent for an ATRP polymerization of sodium 4-styrenesulfonate with a CuBr/bpy catalyst using a MePEOBiB initiator at 100:1 ratio at 30 0C.

table 8B

 The reaction was clearly controlled to a greater degree in the presence of a large molar excess of pyridine, which functions as a "pseudo" ligand, to ensure that the CuBr/bpy catalyst complex remains in solution.

While the ATRP of several types of polar monomers, particularly acidic ones, has proven to be quite challenging, progress continues to be made.(17,19,20)

 Other Functional Monomers Successfully Polymerized by ATRP

The following schematic shows some of the monomers polymerized by ATRP and include styrenes, (meth)acrylates, (meth)acrylamides.  While polymerization of monomers with free acidic groups remain a challenge the can be incorporated into a copolymer if attention is given to presevation of an active catalysy complex throughout the reaction since functionality often dictates the appropriate conditions for an ATRP, solvent, temp, catalyst, etc..

monomers 2

Ionic Liquid Monomers

The development of a simple and universal GPC technique for the precise characterization of poly(ionic liquid)s (PILs) (21) provided the tool to facilitate the evaluation of the “controlled” polymerization of ionic liquid monomers to directly form ionic liquid homopolymers and block copolymers with PIL segments.  This was accomplished by the simple addition of salts containing the same anions as the PILs to the GPC eluents such as Tf2N-, BF4- and PF6-.
In order to evaluate the potential for poly(ionic liquid)s in applications a new class of 1-functionalized-3-methyl triazolium Tf2N- ionic liquid monomers were prepared and polymerized by ATRP. (22)
ionic monomers
The use of vinyl acetylene, in the synthesis scheme shown above, provided access to a wide range of PIL monomers suitable for ATRP in a single step.  The properties of the resulting PILs with pendant functional groups that influence the solubility, Tg and thermal stability provided access to specific properties for targeted applications.

The influence of the salt/counterion on the ATRP of the ionic liquid monomers was systematically examined in a later paper. (23)  Removal of trace amounts of coordinating chloride ion from the pristine ionic liquid monomer prior to polymerization allowed a controlled ATRP to be conducted with a ratio of copper to initiator of 1:1 providing polymers with narrow MWD, ~1.1-1.2.  

PIL block 1

Modular polymerized ionic liquid block copolymer membranes, prepared by RAFT polymerization and a thio-Michael reaction to incorporate the ionic functionality, were evaluated for CO2/N2 separation. (24)  When the composition of the PIL block copolymers were selected so that the bulk copolymers underwent phase separation, these materials show increased permeability relative to PILs while maintaining CO2/N2 selectivity, suggesting that PIL-containing BCPs, prepared by the more direct ATRP procedure outlined above, could be useful materials for the economical separation of CO2 from flue gas emissions.

REFERENCES
(1)    Matyjaszewski, K.;  Jo, S. M.;  Paik, H.-j.; Gaynor, S. G. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 6398-6400.
(2)    Matyjaszewski, K.;  Jo, S. M.;  Paik, H.-j.; Shipp, D. A. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 6431-6438.
(3)    Tsarevsky, N. V.;  Sarbu, T.;  Goebelt, B.; Matyjaszewski, K. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 6142-6148.
(4)    Kowalewski, T.;  Tsarevsky, N. V.; Matyjaszewski, K. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2002, 124, 10632-10633.
(5)    Tsarevsky, N. V.;  Bernaerts, K. V.;  Dufour, B.;  Du Prez, F. E.; Matyjaszewski, K. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 9308-9313.
(6)    Teodorescu, M.; Matyjaszewski, K. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 4826-4831.
(7)    Teodorescu, M.; Matyjaszewski, K. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2000, 21, 190-194.
(8)    Xia, J.;  Zhang, X.; Matyjaszewski, K. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 3531-3533.
(9)    Tsarevsky, N. V.;  Braunecker, W. A.;  Brooks, S. J.; Matyjaszewski, K. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 6817-6824.
(10)    Zhang, X.;  Xia, J.; Matyjaszewski, K. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 5167-5169.
(11)    Coca, S.;  Jasieczek, C. B.;  Beers, K. L.; Matyjaszewski, K. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 1998, 36, 1417-1424.
(12)    Beers, K. L.;  Boo, S.;  Gaynor, S. G.; Matyjaszewski, K. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 5772-5776.
(13)    Matyjaszewski, K.;  Coca, S.; Jasieczek, C. B. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1997, 198, 4011-4017.
(14)    Tsarevsky, N. V.;  Bencherif, S. A.; Matyjaszewski, K. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 4439-4445.
(15)    Matyjaszewski, K.; Tsarevsky, N. In PCT Int. Appl.; (Carnegie Mellon University, USA). WO 0228913, 2002; p 64 pp.
(16)    Tsarevsky, N. V.; Matyjaszewski, K. Chemical Reviews 2007, 107, 2270-2299.
(17)    Tang, W.;  Kwak, Y.;  Braunecker, W.;  Tsarevsky, N. V.;  Coote, M. L.; Matyjaszewski, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10702-10713.
(18)    Tsarevsky, N. V.;  Pintauer, T.; Matyjaszewski, K. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 9768-9778.
(19)    Zhang, X.;  Xia, J.; Matyjaszewski, K. Polym. Prepr. 1999, 40, 440-441.
(20)    Huang, J.; Matyjaszewski, K. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 3577-3583.
(21)    He, H.;  Zhong, M.;  Adzima, B.;  Luebke, D.;  Nulwala, H.; Matyjaszewski, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 4227-4230.
(22)    Adzima, B. J.;  Taylor, S. C.;  He, H.;  Luebke, D. R.;  Matyjaszewski, K.; Nulwala, H. B. J. Polym. Sci., Part A Polym. Chem. 2014, 52, 417-423.
(23)    He, H.;  Zhong, M.;  Luebke, D.;  Nulwala, H.; Matyjaszewski, K. J. Polym. Sci., Part A Polym. Chem. 2014, 52, 2175-84.
(24)    Adzima, B. J.;  Venna, S. R.;  Klara, S. S.;  He, H.;  Zhong, M.;  Luebke, D. R.;  Mauter, M. S.;  Matyjaszewski, K.; Nulwala, H. B. Journal of Materials Chemistry A: Materials for Energy and Sustainability 2014, 2, 7967-7972.