Skip to main content
A bright, mottled cloud dominates this artistic view of a large, dusty galaxy seen nearly edge on. Layers of white, yellow, and red extend from the darker central plane, silhouetting the smoky tendrils of dust clouds in the foreground. One brilliant star dominates the scene just left of center. Long white and red rays — the burst’s particle jets — extend from the star to the top left and toward bottom center. At the fringes of the galaxy is a dark background sprinkled  with stars
This artist’s concept depicts GRB 250702B (left of center) erupting within its host galaxy. Credit: NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/M. Garlick

Researchers Unlock Clues to the Origin of the Longest Gamma-ray Burst Ever Observed

Carnegie Mellon study uncovers the jet launched by an actively feeding black hole

Media Inquiries
Name
Heidi Opdyke
Title
Mellon College of Science

Astronomers have observed the longest gamma-ray burst — a powerful, extragalactic explosion that lasted more than seven hours. It was so extraordinary that several teams of scientists have been poring over a flood of data from both Earth- and space-based telescopes and satellites to make sense of it. Observations from a team led by Carnegie Mellon University are providing crucial information about the possible origin of this unusual event. 

While most gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are over in a minute, this one displayed multiple bursting episodes over the course of seven hours and its afterglow lasted for months. The event, dubbed GRB 250702B, is the longest gamma-ray burst humans have ever witnessed. 

“GRB 250702B is an extremely interesting event that does not neatly match any other high-energy transients that we have observed in the past 50 years,” said Brendan O'Connor, a McWilliams Postdoctoral Fellow at Carnegie Mellon’s McWilliams Center for Cosmology and Astrophysics(opens in new window). “There were multiple, distinct gamma-ray detections separated in time, which is very peculiar. It’s the main reason we all dedicated extensive telescope time to studying it.” 

A view of GRB 250702B’s host galaxy

On Oct. 5, NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope gave astronomers their clearest view of GRB 250702B’s host galaxy, which is so far away its light takes about 8 billion years to reach us. It appears within a star field in the densely packed central plane of our own Milky Way galaxy. In the zoomed inset, tick marks indicate the burst’s position near the top edge of the galaxy’s dark dust lane. This location eliminates the possibility that the burst was associated with the supermassive black hole at the galaxy’s core. The full infrared image is about 2.1 arcminutes across. Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, H. Sears (Rutgers). Image processing: A. Pagan, Space Telescope Science Institute.

Most gamma-ray bursts last from a few milliseconds to a few minutes and are known to form in two ways, either by a merger of two city-sized neutron stars or the collapse of a massive star once its core runs out of fuel. Each produces a new black hole. Some of the matter falling toward the black hole becomes channeled into tight jets of particles that stream out at almost the speed of light, creating gamma rays as they go. But neither of these types of bursts can readily create jets able to fire for days, which is why 250702B poses a unique puzzle. 

The unusual GRB was first identified by NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope(opens in new window) on July 2. Shortly after the initial gamma-ray bursts were detected, a team led by O’Connor directed three space-based telescopes to monitor the afterglow in X-rays, which they did for 65 days. The properties of these X-rays can provide clues about the type of event that caused the GRB. Their findings were published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters(opens in new window)

O’Connor’s comprehensive study of the X-ray data gathered with the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array, and the Chandra X-ray Observatory reveal that GRB 250702B is an outlier that doesn’t quite fit with any of the explanations for the origin of other GRBs. 

Scientists say the best explanation for the outburst is that a black hole consumed a star, but they disagree on exactly how it happened. 

“The continued accretion of matter by the black hole powered an outflow that produced these flares, but the process continued far longer than is possible in standard GRB models,” said O’Connor. “The late X-ray flares show us that the blast’s power source refused to shut off, which means the black hole kept feeding for at least a few days after the initial eruption.” 

The Carnegie Mellon team’s analysis points to a star being shredded by a stellar-mass black hole, which is on the small side as far as black holes go. Instead of the supermassive black holes at the center of all galaxies, these smaller black holes are left behind when a massive star dies. 

In this scenario, the shredded star is eaten by its companion star after becoming spaghettified by the black hole’s gravitational forces. As the black hole rapidly consumes the star’s matter, rapid jets blast outward near the speed of light, producing the initial flashes of gamma-rays and later the X-ray afterglow. Astronomers call this a jetted tidal disruption event (TDE), which is usually linked to a supermassive black hole. However, in this case, O’Connor refers to it as a micro-TDE because it involves a black hole that’s a million times smaller. 

Using a variety of telescopes around the globe and in space, scientists pinpointed GRB 250702B’s location in the constellation Scutum, near the crowded, dusty plane of our Milky Way galaxy. A detailed study(opens in new window) led by Jonathan Carney, a graduate student at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, shows that the host galaxy is very different from the typically small galaxies that host most stellar collapse GRBs. “This galaxy turns out to be surprisingly large, with more than twice the mass of our own galaxy,” he said.

The star field around the host galaxy of GRB 250702B.

The view at left shows the star field around the host galaxy of GRB 250702B. The image incorporates observations from the Gemini North telescope in Hawaii and the Dark Energy Camera mounted on the Víctor M. Blanco 4-meter Telescope at Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile. Right: A close-up view of the host galaxy taken with the Gemini North telescope. This image, which spans 9.5 arcseconds, is the result of over two hours of observations, yet the host galaxy is barely visible due to the large amount of dust surrounding it. The optical and near-infrared DECam data was acquired on July 3, while the near-infrared Gemini North observations were made July 20. Credit: International Gemini Observatory/CTIO/NOIRLab/DOE/NSF/AURA. Image processing: M. Zamani & D. de Martin (NSF NOIRLab)

O’Connor, Carnegie Mellon graduate students Hannah Skobe and Xander Hall, and Assistant Physics Professor Antonella Palmese(opens in new window) contributed to Carney’s research. 

“The studies of the host galaxy can inform the origin of this unusual transient,” Palmese said. “By looking at the morphology and stellar population, we can understand what the history of this galaxy may have been.” 

Skobe led an analysis of the galaxy’s size and shape using images taken with NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope(opens in new window). “Looking at the Hubble data, it was unclear whether the system was a merger of two separate galaxies or a single galaxy with a dust lane,” said Skobe, a third-year graduate student in the Department of Physics. “To investigate this, we modeled the data for both cases but couldn’t distinguish which was preferred.” 

Additional imaging later taken with the NIRcam instrument on NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope(opens in new window) proved that the galaxy was indeed split by a dust lane. 

“The resolution of Webb is unbelievable. We can see so clearly that the burst shined through this dust lane spilling across the galaxy,” said Huei Sears, a postdoctoral researcher at Rutgers University(opens in new window) who led the team that acquired the James Webb Space Telescope imaging. The team included Carnegie Mellon’s O’Connor and Hall. 

This study uses data obtained from several sources, including: Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM(opens in new window)) on NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope (Fermi(opens in new window)); NASA’s Chandra X-Ray Observatory(opens in new window); NASA’s NuSTAR(opens in new window) (Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array) mission; the Burst Alert Telescope on NASA’s Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory(opens in new window)James Webb Space Telescope(opens in new window); the Russian Konus instrument on NASA’s Wind(opens in new window) mission; the Wide-field X-ray Telescope on China’s Einstein Probe; DECam(opens in new window) and NEWFIRM on the NSF Víctor M. Blanco 4-meter Telescope(opens in new window) at Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO(opens in new window)); Gemini Multi-Object Spectrographs (GMOS-N and GMOS-S(opens in new window)) at the International Gemini Observatory(opens in new window); Fraunhofer Telescope at Wendelstein Observatory(opens in new window); Hubble Space Telescope (HST(opens in new window)); Keck I Telescope at the W. M. Keck Observatory(opens in new window); and FourStar(opens in new window) on the Magellan Baade Telescope(opens in new window).

Brendan O'Connor

Brendan O'Connor

Antonella Palmese

Antonella Palmese

Hannah Skobe

Hannah Skobe

— Related Content —