Minor in Cybersecurity and International Conflict
The minor in cybersecurity and international conflict analyzes the role of cyber warfare and cybersecurity in international politics—past, present, and future. Cyber attacks by nation-states and their proxies have the potential to reshape how wars are fought in the twenty-first century. As such, the complexity and policy challenge of cyber-engagements is immense and altogether without precedent. The minor addresses the role of deterrence, dissuasion, and attribution in cyber conflict, while also studying the nuances of key components of modern warfare—from the security dilemma to escalation management.
Courses in this minor focus on the existing gaps in our understanding of cybersecurity and international conflict, such as whether or not cyberspace is offense or defense dominant and which factors are most important in determining the answer to this, and other relevant questions, including how nation-states, their primary adversaries, and a bevy of nonstate actors engage online and in the virtual and information environments. Accordingly, the minor exposes students to basic technology concepts, methods of attack and defense, potential strategy and goals for cyber-engagement, and response and forensics for cyber-engagements.
Alongside conventional methods of warfare, cybersecurity has rapidly developed into a centerpiece of state’s ability to project power and impose its will in order to achieve its national priorities and strategic objectives. As the United States and other emerging cyber powers craft and implement doctrine in this nascent domain, there is likely to be a rapid increase in activity, from efforts to disrupt the online activities of global terrorist networks like the Islamic State, to cybersecurity threats in the Russia-Ukraine war, to near daily raids on foreign networks designed to cripple states’ cyberweapons before they can be deployed.
In the shifting landscape of cyber capabilities, how will laws, authorities, and policies keep pace? What are the implications and consequences of actions that may be considered “short of war” by some countries but “above the threshold” of conflict by others? Will a more aggressive defensive posture with respect to cybersecurity inadvertently increase the risk of conflict with states that sponsor malicious hacking groups? What is the proper balance between offense and defense in cybersecurity and how are cyber operations best integrated into a country’s overall military strategy?
Unlike other kinds of conflicts, the attribution of attacks presents significant challenges. Indeed, in many cases, it can be difficult to determine whether the attacker is a nation-state, a nonstate actor, a criminal gang, or a lone hacktivist. Investigators must combine technical and traditional methods to identify potentially responsible parties and to understand their intent. If the aggressor’s identity cannot be confirmed, how can a counterattack be launched? Some attackers may seek to mount “false flag” attacks and deception, for example, that misdirect defenders to counter-attack in the wrong direction. Additionally, what are appropriate responses to attacks made on civil infrastructure and private business operations, such as in the areas of financial services, transportation, energy, entertainment, and health care? In other words, what are the appropriate rules of engagement for national systems, infrastructural systems, businesses, and individuals? When, for example, is a counterattack or a “kinetic” response permissible?
These questions have major implications for the study of war and peace. More than at any time in the past, those who seek to start war may be harder to find and their motives more difficult to discern. The cybersecurity and international conflict minor outlined herein tackles the social-scientific dimensions of cybersecurity with a focus on the implications of the cyber age for modern statecraft, warfare, elections (local, state, and national), and politics, more generally.
Students must take one of the following two foundational courses (9 units):
|84-326||Theories of International Relations||9|
Students must take all of the following core courses (24 units):
|84-387||Technology and Policy of Cyber War||9|
|84-388||Concepts of War and Cyber War||6|
|84-405||The Future of Warfare||9|
Students must take three courses from the following list of elective courses (27 units). At least one course (9 units) must be taken from the Institute for Politics and Strategy and have an 84-number.
|84-200||Security War Game Simulation||6|
|84-312||Terrorism in Sub-Saharan Africa||6|
|84-317||Defense Resourcing: From Strategy to Execution||6|
|84-323||War and Peace in the Contemporary Middle East||9|
|84-325||Contemporary American Foreign Policy||9|
|84-327||Repression and Control in Dictatorships||9|
|84-328||Military Strategy and Doctrine||9|
|84-370||Nuclear Security & Arms Control||9|
|84-372||Space and National Security||9|
|84-373||Emerging Technologies and the Law||9|
|84-380||US Grand Strategy||9|
|84-383||Cyber Policy as National Policy||6|
|84-386||The Privatization of Force||9|
|84-389||Terrorism and Insurgency||9|
|84-390||Social Media, Technology, and Conflict||9|
|16-735||Ethics and Robotics||12|
|17-200||Ethics and Policy Issues in Computing||9|
|17-303||Cryptocurrencies, Blockchains and Applications||Var.|
|17-331||Information Security, Privacy, and Policy||12|
|17-334||Usable Privacy and Security||9|
|17-702||Current Topics in Privacy Seminar||3|
|79-301||History of Surveillance: From the Plantation to Data Capitalism||6|
|79-302||Killer Robots:The Ethics, Law, and Politics of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems||6|
|80-249||AI, Society, and Humanity||9|
|95-444||Cybersecurity Policy and Governance I||6|
Students are permitted to double count a maximum of two courses between the minor in Cybersecurity and International Conflict and another major or minor.