
Ryan Award for Meritorious Teaching
The William H. and Frances S. Ryan Award for Meritorious Teaching is given annually to a full-time Carnegie Mellon University faculty member who has demonstrated unusual devotion and effectiveness in teaching undergraduate or graduate students.
This award recognizes sustained excellence in teaching undergraduate or graduate students across one’s teaching career at Carnegie Mellon University based on:
- outstanding, innovative, and inclusive course design and classroom teaching,
- effective design and impactful implementation of new learning materials,
- exemplary mentorship of student research or creative projects,
- significant impacts on the professional development of graduate- and undergraduate student instructors as current and future educators, and/or
- long-term impacts on students.
Who Can Nominate?
Any group of three or more of the following people may nominate:
- current or retired CMU faculty members, administrators, staff
- current or former full-time CMU undergraduate or graduate students or postdocs
Students seeking to nominate someone are strongly encouraged to collaborate with faculty and/or administrators in the nominee’s academic department to ensure a strong nomination.
Who is Eligible?
All full-time current employees of Carnegie Mellon University are eligible to be nominated for the award. No one person may win the award more than once or simultaneously with the Ryan Award or Academic Advising Award.
Nomination Process
Nominations consist of two phases
Please submit nominations as a single PDF using these online forms:
Questions should be directed to the Vice Provost for Education.
What is the Phase 1 Nomination Process?
When is the nomination deadline? November 3, 2025
The Phase 1 nomination letter must be submitted on or before November 3, 2025 via the nomination form to be considered for that academic year.
What is submitted?
In Phase 1, nominators must submit one letter (maximum two single-spaced pages) that explains why the individual is worthy of the award. Because the decision to advance the nomination to the second phase is based on this letter alone, it should be descriptive, convincing, and specifically focused on addressing the award criteria listed above.
The Phase 1 nomination letter should be submitted as a PDF via the nomination form on or before November 3, 2025.
When are finalists selected for Phase 2?
The award committee will select two to five people to be considered for Phase 2 of the nomination process. Nominators will be notified of outcomes in December.
What is the Phase 2 Nomination Process?
When is the nomination due? February 2, 2026
The phase 2 nomination letter must be submitted on or before February 2, 2026 via the nomination form to be considered for that academic year.
Who prepares the nomination materials for finalists?
The nominators of each person selected for phase 2, together with the relevant dean/department head (or their designee), are responsible for preparing the full case for that nomination. In the case of a department head nominee, the relevant dean should be included in preparation of the full package.
What is submitted?
The final nomination packet should include the following:
- a cover memo/page detailing the contents of the nomination package,
- a letter from the phase 1 nominators (original or revised, maximum two single spaced pages),
- no more than 10 letters of recommendation (maximum two single spaced pages each) from appropriate parties, such as Carnegie Mellon faculty or administrators, colleagues, and present and former TAs and students (majors or non-majors),
- a teaching statement written by the nominee that indicates what they does as an educator and why (some nominators recycle educational statements from other venues so as to keep the nomination confidential),
- two to four samples of innovations (assignments and/or teaching methods) that are annotated to explain the nature of the innovation,
- two to four student projects (poems, photos, essays, projects, etc.,) again annotated to provide context,
- samples of the instructor's feedback to students (not to exceed 10 single spaced pages),
- Faculty Course Evaluations for all courses in at least the preceding five years (they can be supplemented with information on the number of students enrolled in each course and whether the students were majors or non-majors), and
- the nominee’s brief CV (2-4 pages).
Advice for nominators and letter writers:
Letters should:
- be limited to two single spaced pages each,
- specifically and directly describe how the nominee demonstrates sustained excellence regarding the award criteria listed above,
- focus on the nominee’s teaching and/or student mentoring,
- represent colleagues’ knowledge of the nominee's teaching, mentorship, and interactions with students via:
- experiences team teaching and/or co-mentoring, direct observation, conversations with the nominee, etc.
- interactions with the nominee’s students,
- represent teaching assistants’ knowledge of the nominee's impact on their development as teachers, and
- represent students’ experiences* being taught or mentored by the nominee.
*Students may need more guidance in terms of expectations of what a good letter of recommendation should look like, please provide them with the criteria and advice above. Effective student letters address the intersection of the criteria and the student experience as well as include real-life examples from their experience and interactions with the nominee and the nominee’s short- and/or long-term impacts on the letter writer.
Please note that selected quotes from the winner's nomination packet may be used for publicity purposes.
The phase 2 nomination packet should be submitted as a single PDF via the nomination form on or before February 2, 2026.
When is the award winner announced?
The award committee will select one winner annually. Nominators of all finalists will be notified of outcomes in March. The winner, along with their nominators, colleagues, and friends and family, will be invited to attend the Celebration of Education event in April to receive their award.
Administration
The provost is responsible for the administration of the nomination and selection process, including calling for proposals and convening the award selection committee.
Selection Committee
The award selection committee consists of:
- the three most recent recipients of the Ryan Award,
- three faculty members appointed by the provost,
- two undergraduate students and one graduate student selected through a process developed by the dean of Student Affairs, and
- the chairperson of the committee (the Senior Administrative Coordinator for Programs and Business Operations for the Office of the Vice Provost for Education, a non-voting member). If this person is unavailable, the provost will appoint another faculty member or administrator to serve in this capacity.
The selection committee adopts its own rules of procedure.
Selection
The committee will choose one person to be recommended to the provost as the year's recipient of the award. Upon the provost's approval, the recipient will be notified and the award will be presented at the Celebration of Education event in the spring.
Past Recipients
2025
Larry Heimann
Information Systems
2024
Mame-Fatou Niang
Department of Languages, Cultures & Applied Linguistics
2023
Catherine Moore
College of Fine Arts
2022
David Anderson
Physics
2020
Barry Luokkala
Physics
2019
Po-Shen Loh
Mathematical Sciences
2018
Baruch Fischhoff
Engineering and Public Policy and Institute for Politics and Strategy
2017
Laurence Ales
Tepper School of Business
2016
J. Andrew Bagnell
Robotics Institute and Deparment of Modern Languages
2015
Rebecca Nugent
Deparment of Statistics & Data Science
2014
Anne Mundell
School of Drama
2013
John F. Mackey
Deparment of Mathematical Sciences
2012
Yueming Yu
Deparment of Modern Languages
2011
Bruce Armitage
Deparment of Chemistry
2010
Paul S. Fischbeck
Departments of Social and Decision Sciences and Engineering and Public Policy
2009
Cliff I. Davidson
Departments of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Engineering and Public Policy
2008
Curtis A. Meyer
Department of Physics
2007
Gordon Rule
Department of Biological Sciences
2006
Mark Mentzer
School of Design
2005
Karen Stump
Department of Chemistry
2004
Steve Rudich
Department of Computer Science
2003
Peggy Knapp
Department of English
2002
Laura Lee
School of Architecture
2001
Natalie Baker-Shirer
School of Drama
2000
Patricia Bellan-Gillen
School of Art
1999
Jim Daniels
Department of English
1998
Thomas Ferguson
Department of Physics
1997
Steve Klepper
Department of Social and Decision Sciences
1996
Michael West
Department of Modern Languages
1995
John L. Woolford
Department of Biological Sciences
1994
Lawrence Cartwright
Department of Civil Engineering
1992
Christian Hallstein
Department of Modern Languages
1991
Linda R. Kauffman
Department of Biological Sciences
1990
Margaret Clark
Department of Psychology
Jack Schaeffer
Department of Mathematical Sciences
1989
Helmut Vogel
Department of Physics
1988
Richard Schoenwald
Department of History
1987
Joel B. Greenhouse
Department of Statistics
1986
Ludwig Schaefer
Department of History
Edmond Ko
Department of Chemical Engineering
1985
Elisabeth Orion
School of Drama
William J. Hrusa
Department of Mathematical Sciences
1984
Myung S. Jhon
Department of Chemical Engineering
1983
Michael P. Weber
Departments of History and Philosophy
1982
Robert W. Kraemer
Department of Physics
1981
Barbara J.B. Anderson
School of Drama
1980
James F. Hoburg
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Granville H. Jones
Department of English
1979
Robert A. Eisenstein
Department of Physics
1978
Helen Gossard
School of Music
1977
Irving H. Bartlett
Departments of History and Philosophy
1976
David T. Tuma
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
1975
Charles H. Van Dyke
Department of Chemistry
1974
Edward L. Cussler
Department of Chemical Engineering
1973
Herbert T. Olds
School of Art
1972
Gladys Schmitt
Department of English
1971
Robert W. Dunlap
Departments of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science
1970
James H. Korn
Department of Psychology
1969
Richard A. Moore
Department of Mathematical Sciences
1968
Beekman W. Cottrell
Department of English
1967
Oleta Benn
School of Music
1966
Robert R. Rothfus
Department of Chemical Engineering
1965
Hugh D. Young
Department of Physics
1964
Edwin Fenton
Departments of History and Philosophy
1963
Sam Rosenberg
School of Art
1962
Borden Hoover
Department of Mathematical Sciences
1961
A. Fred Sochatoff
Department of English