JoSS Article: Volume 11

Understanding the Composition of an Ensemble of Personal Networks

Ulrik Brandesa, Jrgen Lernerb, Miranda J. Lubbersc, Christopher McCarthyd, Jos Luis Molinae and Uwe Nagelf,

Ulrik.Brandes@uni-konstanz.de

 

a Professor at University of Konstanz,

b Post-Doctoral Researcher at University of Konstanz,

c Post-Doctoral Researcher at Autonomous University of Barcelona,

d Program Director at University of Florida,

e Professor at Autonomous University of Barcelona,

f Graduate Student at University of Konstanz

 

Understanding the Composition of an Ensemble of Personal Networks

 

 

Self-Commentary

Personal networks are often classified either by structural indices or their composition of alters. We combine these two dimensions by considering attribute values as positions in social space. This way, social roles can be derived via clustering, and these in turn lead to role graphs representing the main characteristics in comparable aggregates.

Role graphs are obtained by contracting all alters occupying the same position in social space, and adding weights to nodes and edges representing the support and internal density of a role, and the density of connections between roles. An unsupervised clustering of role graphs yields the main structural trends in the ensemble.

A graphical representation is constructed in two steps: each personal network is laid out individually, and then treated as an object that is positioned with respect to the other objects. In the individual layouts, the fixed layout of the 4-node role graph is used as a frame of reference, and each alter position is biased slightly toward the position of its role. Since the clustering of role graphs cannot be represented well in two dimensions, personal networks are positioned using a combination of their pairwise role-graph similarity, and a bias towards the corner in which their cluster representative is shown.

Application to an ensemble of migrant networks composed of 45 alters each revealed four prototypical cases that largely coincide with expectations derived from the literature. Roles are defined by country of origin (same/different) and country of residence (same/different) with respect to ego. Role graphs combine attribute composition as represented in the relative size of roles, and structural characteristics as represented by edge density inside and between roles. The overview indicates, however, that one of the four prototypical cases (`integration') is not exactly as expected (overrepresentation of transnationals), and has a much smaller support. The visualization can be read on different levels, since the main finding is apparent from the overall spatial distribution, but every detail in the data leading to it can be traced individually.

 

PEER REVIEW COMMENT No. 1

This network role graph offers a unique representation of the distribution of immigrant ego networks that nicely crosses levels of analysis.  At a macro level, the visualization is organized along role types, where some ego networks are characterized by many ties to fellow immigrants while other ego networks are characterized by assimilation, where there are many ties to people of the immigration country. At the micro level, ego networks are placed in a multidimensional space, showing how close they are to ideal role types. The role graph display is a highly creative layout for an important type of data (ego networks). The image is very complex, and thus rewards multiple views and continued study, this represents a balancing connundrumm between a single summary point and detail. Nice work.

 

PEER REVIEW COMMENT No. 2

The image portrays a multidimensional space of immigrant ego networks combining two crucial features: ethnic composition and density. The placement of each ego net on the display is a according to its similarity to the other ego nets surrounding it and its similarity to four prototypical ego net configurations. The use of color to indicate ethnic composition is effective at a distance however the detailed darkness around the circles and edge color denoting density gets lost (perhaps a scale/resolution issue?). Although this image conveys much detailed information, substantively would be nice to think through what is gained over a simpler representation, boiled down to the prototypes and the proportion of ego nets that are clustered with that prototype, for example .

 

PEER REVIEW COMMENT No. 3

This creatively re-imagined scatterplot effectively provides information at multiple levels. At the macro-level, it gives us an intuition about the distribution of ego network structures across typologies, while at the micro-level it provides case-level insight into the structures behind the patterns. I would be interested to see some sort of independent variable mapped into this visualization- what predisposes these migrants toward certain network patterns?